Le livre est actuellement en rupture de stock
Paramètres
- 112pages
- 4 heures de lecture
En savoir plus sur le livre
The great theorist of radical liberation analyzes the relationship between authority and freedom.This is the first paperback edition of what is now recognized as Marcuse’s most important collection of writings on philosophy. He analyzes and attacks some of the main intellectual currents of European thoughts from the Reformation to the Cold War. In a survey that includes Luther, Calvin, Kant, Burke, Hegel and Bergson, he shows how certain concepts of authority and liberty are constant elements in their very different systems. The book also contains Marcuse’s famous response to Karl Popper’s Poverty of Historicism, and his critique of Sartre.
Achat du livre
A Study on Authority, Herbert Marcuse
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 2007
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (souple)
Nous vous informerons par e-mail dès que nous l’aurons retrouvé.
Modes de paiement
Il manque plus que ton avis ici.
- Titre
- A Study on Authority
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- Herbert Marcuse
- Éditeur
- Verso Books
- Publié
- 2007
- Format
- souple
- Pages
- 112
- ISBN10
- 1844672093
- ISBN13
- 9781844672097
- Séries
- Mots clés
- Nonfiction, Sciences sociales, Histoires vraies, Sciences politiques & Politique, Thématique philosophique, Politique, Presse d'opinion & Essais, Sociologie, Société, Théories scientifiques
- Évaluation
- 3,85 sur 5
- Description
- The great theorist of radical liberation analyzes the relationship between authority and freedom.This is the first paperback edition of what is now recognized as Marcuse’s most important collection of writings on philosophy. He analyzes and attacks some of the main intellectual currents of European thoughts from the Reformation to the Cold War. In a survey that includes Luther, Calvin, Kant, Burke, Hegel and Bergson, he shows how certain concepts of authority and liberty are constant elements in their very different systems. The book also contains Marcuse’s famous response to Karl Popper’s Poverty of Historicism, and his critique of Sartre.