Paramètres
- 223pages
- 8 heures de lecture
En savoir plus sur le livre
A surge of political trends and upheavals all over the world confronts German foreign policy with a world that is dramatically different from Berlin Republic unification in 1990. Brexit, American de-commitment to Europe and the rise of isolationist, populist forces within Germany as well as in other European countries and the U.S. have undermined the foundations of Germany's foreign policy. Germany is suddenly faced with another historical shift that is starting to shake the bedrock of its foreign policy. A council of experts for strategic foresight can address Germany's strategic cultural deficit, its civilian power fixation, its resorts principle of ministerial independence, and its coalition governance conflicts.
Achat du livre
Germany From Peace to Power, James D. Bindenagel
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 2020
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (rigide),
- État du livre
- Bon
- Prix
- 28,99 €
Modes de paiement
Personne n'a encore évalué .
- Titre
- Germany From Peace to Power
- Sous-titre
- Can Germany Lead in Europe Without Dominating It?
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- James D. Bindenagel
- Éditeur
- V&R Unipress
- Publié
- 2020
- Format
- rigide
- Pages
- 223
- ISBN10
- 3847110519
- ISBN13
- 9783847110514
- Séries
- Mots clés
- Sciences politiques & Politique, Allemagne, Problèmes sociaux, Relations internationales, Union européenne
- Description
- A surge of political trends and upheavals all over the world confronts German foreign policy with a world that is dramatically different from Berlin Republic unification in 1990. Brexit, American de-commitment to Europe and the rise of isolationist, populist forces within Germany as well as in other European countries and the U.S. have undermined the foundations of Germany's foreign policy. Germany is suddenly faced with another historical shift that is starting to shake the bedrock of its foreign policy. A council of experts for strategic foresight can address Germany's strategic cultural deficit, its civilian power fixation, its resorts principle of ministerial independence, and its coalition governance conflicts.