Bookbot

Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change

Auteurs

Enregistrer

Paramètres

  • 200pages
  • 7 heures de lecture

En savoir plus sur le livre

Roger Lass is concerned about the nature of argumentation within linguistics and the status of its data and theoretical constructs. Through an examination of standard strategies of explanation in historical linguistics (particularly of phonological change), in the light of past approaches to scientific epistemology, Dr Lass convincingly demonstrates that attempts to model explanations of linguistic change on those of the physical sciences are failures both in practice and in principle. Linguists can neither assimilate their discipline crudely to the natural or the other human sciences nor, at the other extreme, shelter behind the notion of a private self-validating paradigm. Although Dr Lass outlines some tentative paths towards an alternative epistemology, his main concern is that linguists should confront the philosophical implications of their subject, and he raises questions which both linguists and philosophers will need to consider.

Achat du livre

Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change, Roger Lass

Langue
Année de publication
1980
Reliure
(rigide),
État du livre
Bon
Prix
37,99 €

Modes de paiement

Personne n'a encore évalué .Évaluer

Titre
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics - 27: On Explaining Language Change
Langue
Anglais
Auteurs
Roger Lass
Publié
1980
Format
rigide
Pages
200
ISBN10
0521228360
ISBN13
9780521228367
Séries
Mots clés
Description
Roger Lass is concerned about the nature of argumentation within linguistics and the status of its data and theoretical constructs. Through an examination of standard strategies of explanation in historical linguistics (particularly of phonological change), in the light of past approaches to scientific epistemology, Dr Lass convincingly demonstrates that attempts to model explanations of linguistic change on those of the physical sciences are failures both in practice and in principle. Linguists can neither assimilate their discipline crudely to the natural or the other human sciences nor, at the other extreme, shelter behind the notion of a private self-validating paradigm. Although Dr Lass outlines some tentative paths towards an alternative epistemology, his main concern is that linguists should confront the philosophical implications of their subject, and he raises questions which both linguists and philosophers will need to consider.