The Swiss-born writer Marianne Ehrmann, who lived and worked in Vienna, Strasbourg, and Stuttgart, initially pursued an acting career. Later, as a fiction writer, Ehrmann made educating women her primary goal. In this biography, Professor Madland follows this fascinating woman's life story, emphasizing her unique situation as editor of two women's journals. Ehrmann's opinionated wit and experience in the public sphere as an eighteenth-century working woman gave her a distinctive voice to enliven contemporary gender debates. She argues that reason and emotion should not exist in separate spheres, and that men and women should share both so that they may become better persons.
Helga Stipa Madland Livres
Helga Stipa Madland fait la transition de sa carrière universitaire en littérature allemande à la création de fictions et d'essais captivants. Son écriture explore les subtilités de la psyché humaine et la complexité des relations, abordant des thèmes universels tels que la vie, l'amour et la perte. La prose de Madland se caractérise souvent par sa qualité intime et introspective, invitant les lecteurs à réfléchir sur leurs propres expériences. Elle offre une perspective unique façonnée par une profonde compréhension des traditions littéraires et une observation fine de la condition humaine.



Non-Aristotelian drama in eighteenth century Germany and its modernity: J. M. R. Lenz
- 308pages
- 11 heures de lecture
The changing concept of mimesis from Bodmer and Breitinger to Lenz had a profound effect upon dramatic language, character and structure. Their notion of mimesis, which rejects Aristotle and the imitation of existing models, provided the impetus for innovation on the German stage. The dramatic theory and practice of J. M. R. Lenz is not an abrupt caesura breaking with the conventions of Enlightenment drama, but the culmination of a Non-Aristotelian tradition beginning with Bodmer and Breitinger. Lenz's dramatic theory and practice, which has found a resounding echo in twentieth-century dramaturgy, is examined in light of his Non-Aristotelian predecessors.