Épuisé
Paramètres
- 352pages
- 13 heures de lecture
En savoir plus sur le livre
David Lodge's novels have earned comparisons to those of John Updike and Philip Roth and established him as "a cult figure on both sides of the Atlantic" ( The New York Times ). Thinks . . . , his witty new novel about secret infidelities and the nature of consciousness, unfolds in the alternating voices of Ralph Messenger, director of the Centre for Cognitive Science at the University of Gloucester, and Helen Reed, a novelist and writer in residence at the university. Mutually attracted, the two end up in a moral standoff that is shattered by events that dramatically confirm the truth of Ralph's "we can never know for certain what another person is thinking."
Achat du livre
Thinks..., David Lodge
- Langue
- Année de publication
- 2002
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (souple)
Nous vous informerons par e-mail dès que nous l’aurons retrouvé.
Modes de paiement
Il manque plus que ton avis ici.
- Titre
- Thinks...
- Langue
- Anglais
- Auteurs
- David Lodge
- Éditeur
- Penguin Books
- Publié
- 2002
- Format
- souple
- Pages
- 352
- ISBN10
- 0142000868
- ISBN13
- 9780142000861
- Séries
- Mots clés
- Fiction, Thèmes psychologiques, Humour, Littérature contemporaine, Amour, Littérature britannique, Mort, Sexualité et intimité, Littérature anglaise, Université, Réflexions et Pensées, Histoires d'Amour, Conscience, Pensée, Roman universitaire
- Première publication
- 2001
- Titre original
- Thinks...
- Évaluation
- 3,75 sur 5
- Description
- David Lodge's novels have earned comparisons to those of John Updike and Philip Roth and established him as "a cult figure on both sides of the Atlantic" ( The New York Times ). Thinks . . . , his witty new novel about secret infidelities and the nature of consciousness, unfolds in the alternating voices of Ralph Messenger, director of the Centre for Cognitive Science at the University of Gloucester, and Helen Reed, a novelist and writer in residence at the university. Mutually attracted, the two end up in a moral standoff that is shattered by events that dramatically confirm the truth of Ralph's "we can never know for certain what another person is thinking."