Linking Strategic Gains to the Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) doctrine

En savoir plus sur le livre

The essay examines the "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) doctrine, arguing that it serves as a significant tool for the international community to prevent mass violence and human rights violations, contrary to its critics' claims. Initially intended to streamline humanitarian interventions, R2P faces criticism for potentially infringing on state sovereignty and being exploited by powerful nations to exert control over weaker states. The analysis delves into these controversies and the ongoing debate surrounding the effectiveness and ethical implications of R2P in international politics.