Proportionality and Judicial Activism

En savoir plus sur le livre

The book presents empirical evidence demonstrating that courts avoid employing the proportionality test as a tool for judicial activism. It explores the implications of this restraint on judicial decision-making and the broader impact on legal interpretations. Through its analysis, the work sheds light on the relationship between judicial practices and the principles of proportionality, offering insights into the motivations behind court behaviors in various cases.