Bookbot

New Directions for Evaluation - 126: Enhancing Disaster and Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Through Evaluation

Paramètres

  • 128pages
  • 5 heures de lecture

En savoir plus sur le livre

The first priniciple of humanitarian assistance is "do no harm." The second might be, "do better!" Enter the evaluation of emergency and disaster management. This issue consolidates reflections from evaluation practices in disaster and emergency management. Our humanitarian impulse, as in the aftermaths of the Rwandan genocide, Hurricane Katrina, the Indian Ocean tsunami, and the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, is an enduring quality. The route from donor to affected population is long and varied. When sudden, unprecedented needs are juxtaposed with expectional levels of charitable responses, the question is whether the responses were good enough. Did supply meet demand? Was it the right thing? Was it done well? Who received support? Was it appropriate? Was the timing right? Can it be improved? All are questions for evaluation. For populations traumatized by disaster, the answers have consequences for protection, for restoration of individual and community efficacy, and ultimately for hope and dignity.

Achat du livre

New Directions for Evaluation - 126: Enhancing Disaster and Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Through Evaluation, Liesel Ashley Ritchie, Wayne MacDonald

Langue
Année de publication
2010
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(souple),
État du livre
Bon
Prix
11,49 €

Modes de paiement

Personne n'a encore évalué .Évaluer

Titre
New Directions for Evaluation - 126: Enhancing Disaster and Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Through Evaluation
Langue
Anglais
Éditeur
Jossey-Bass
Publié
2010
Format
souple
Pages
128
ISBN10
0470769122
ISBN13
9780470769126
Séries
Mots clés
Description
The first priniciple of humanitarian assistance is "do no harm." The second might be, "do better!" Enter the evaluation of emergency and disaster management. This issue consolidates reflections from evaluation practices in disaster and emergency management. Our humanitarian impulse, as in the aftermaths of the Rwandan genocide, Hurricane Katrina, the Indian Ocean tsunami, and the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, is an enduring quality. The route from donor to affected population is long and varied. When sudden, unprecedented needs are juxtaposed with expectional levels of charitable responses, the question is whether the responses were good enough. Did supply meet demand? Was it the right thing? Was it done well? Who received support? Was it appropriate? Was the timing right? Can it be improved? All are questions for evaluation. For populations traumatized by disaster, the answers have consequences for protection, for restoration of individual and community efficacy, and ultimately for hope and dignity.